Why Isn't Gender Diversity More Of An Issue For The Banks?
"Diverse teams are smarter teams", said Deutsche Bank's Josef Ackermann
“Sometimes we have to take scary methods in order to achieve worthwhile results,” UK Equalities Minister Harriet Harman told an audience at a meeting of the Fawcett Society, a body that campaigns for equality between men and women.
At this meeting in early May, she pointed in particular at the need to encourage banks to raise the proportion of women in middle and senior management.
Equalities Bill
Harman is trying to push the Equalities Bill through the UK Parliament at a time when her government is at its lowest ebb. Faced with a major scandal around MP’s expenses and the wider problem of spiralling government debt amidst the near collapse of the global financial system, Harman is hoping to seize the moment to push for change.
There is opposition to the Bill from the business community, particularly coming at a time when many companies are fighting for survival. And one of Harman’s biggest obstacles is sitting across the Cabinet table – Business Secretary Lord Mandelson.
The End to the Pay Gap?
But if Harman does get the Bill through, companies may find that they have to own up about the different salaries they pay their male and female employees.
They will also be able to choose to hire a woman (or someone from another underrepresented group) over other candidates of equal stature without fear of being sued for discrimination.
Positive Action
Positive discrimination is generally disliked by business people, including many women, who fear it will raise doubts about the merit of a particular candidate.
But in one of our interviews, Piyush Gupta, CEO of South East Asia Pacific, Citibank told us: “Look, if you’re a smart business manager and you know you have to hire a certain number of women, you’re going to make absolutely sure that you don’t hire lemons. Doing so would only hurt your business.”
WEB Conference, London
On Tuesday, May 12th, the BBC Newsnight anchor Kirsty Wark asked a panel of businesspeople the question of the moment – would it have made a difference if banks had had more women at the top? She was moderating a discussion at the Women in European Business Conference 2009, organised by the women’s network of Deutsche Bank.
The theme was “The Art of Possibility” and 2000 people, mostly women, filled the seats of a theatre auditorium at the Barbican Centre in Silk Street, close to the City of London.
Dr. Josef Ackermann, Chairman of the Management Board and the Group Executive Committee of Deutsche Bank AG said in his introduction that, “a diverse team is a smarter team.” He had seen this for himself during two major crises of recent times: September 11 and the present financial mess. In both cases, the way women responded had impressed him. The bank was therefore working to improve the representation of women at the top. (Presently, however, there are no women on the Management Board or the Group Executive Committee at Deutsche Bank).
Did Men Cause the Mess?
When asked directly by Wark, one of the male panellists Liam Kane, Chief Executive of the East London Business Alliance, did agree that things may not have turned out so badly if more banks had a better balance of men and women at the top. However, neither he nor the other panel members took up the opportunity to explore the issue further.
Both of the men on the panel – Kane and David Tyler, Chairman, Logica plc – agreed that women brought fresh qualities to a management team such as empathy and a willingness to ask questions. But they did not link this realisation to the question of improved decision-making at the top levels of companies in the financial sector.
“But if business leaders do recognise the value that a critical mass of women bring to management teams, then why isn’t the issue of gender balance in the financial sector one of mugh higher priority? That is, perhaps, the question.”
The audience reacted when Tyler explained that on one occasion he had not been able to fill some non-executive director positions with women, in spite of the fact that he had very much wanted to hire women.
The polar explorer and business entrepreneur, Caroline Hamilton said that she did not understand the logic of his position. Earlier, Tyler had talked about the importance of taking risks in your career and admitted that he had accepted jobs when he may not have been entirely ready for them (something men are said to be more ready to do than women). The advice to the women was to take more risks.
Yet, said Hamilton, he was now saying he did not hire women because they were not completely suited to the roles. Looking somewhat surprised at the audience’s support for Hamilton’s position, Tyler said that he had parachuted people with good qualities into jobs on some occasions but it was not approporiate every time. He may well have been prudent and correct to have done what he did – only he knows the details. However, a small chink in Tyler’s armour as a male supporter of gender diversity seemed to have been revealed.
Women and the Financial Crash
Finally, Benjamin Zander, the conductor of the Boston Philarmonic Orchestra gave a rousing, amusing and inspiring keynote closing speech in which he argued that leadership was all about taking people from the downward spiral to the world of opportunity.
This is, perhaps, Harman’s challenge to persuade men and women in business that the whole thing needs to be pushed by government. You might have thought that 2000 women bankers would have felt that a lack of gender balance was THE issue of the moment. But it would seem that they did not.
Of course, there are many complex reasons behind the crash and plenty of good books are being produced to explain it. Fool’s Gold by the FT journalist Gillian Tett is one of them. Tett reveals the small group of very clever people at JP Morgan who invented credit derivatives in the 90s, investment vehicles which Warren Buffet correctly described as “financial weapons of mass destruction”. Among them was a British woman, Blythe Masters. As inventors they are not wholly to blame. The regulators, the bosses of the banks that did not make sure they understood the new financial vehicles, the governments that encouraged light regulation and the bonus culture all contributed to the bubble that eventually burst. But having a woman among the clique that conjured up what became known as SIVs (structured investment vehicles) is a useful reminder that women are not blameless.
But if business leaders do recognise the value that a critical mass of women bring to management teams, then why isn’t the issue of gender balance in the financial sector one of mugh higher priority? That is, perhaps, the question. At least, it warrants more serious discussion and debate.
Featured
- Visionary CEOs want more senior women
- How sticky is the floor?
- Women's Role in the Financial Crisis
- Women promoting women
- Men, Women and The Financial Crisis
- Business Heads Give Up a Day to Network with Top Women
- So, Women Do Have The Vision Thing
- Managers as farmers
- Women in the debate
- Why Should Women Copy Men
- Why We Need Trust









Comments
This article hasn't been commented on yet.